Life, Entertainment, Media


In the wake of the recent bomb scare in Boston, the head of Cartoon Network has resigned.

The bomb scare caused by a Cartoon Network advertising campaign has cost the head of the Atlanta-based network his job.

Jim Samples, the General Manager and Vice-President of the network owned by Turner Broadcasting, stepped down Friday.

In an e-mail to company employees Samples said “I deeply regret the negative publicity and expense caused to our company as a result of this campaign.”

“I feel compelled to step down in recognition of the gravity of the situation that occurred under my watch.”

The company agreed earlier this week to pay $2 million to the city of Boston to cover the cost of the bomb scare that shut down highways and roads across the city.

But let’s just say that the signs in Boston were not greeted by panic. Doesn’t it strike anyone as odd that in Cartoon Network’s judgement it would be a great idea to have an advertising campaign in major cities consisting of posting pictures of a cartoon character making an obscene gesture? For that alone, the head of the network should have been ashamed and embarassed… but I guess that’s not the age in which we are living.

del.icio.us:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down digg:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down spurl:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down wists:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down simpy:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down newsvine:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down blinklist:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down furl:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down reddit:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down fark:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down blogmarks:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down Y!:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down smarking:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down magnolia:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down segnalo:Cartoon Network Head Steps Down

In case you missed it, earlier this week the blog Snapped Shot discovered that Al Jazeera newsmagazine had hot-linked an image from his site for one of their articles blaming Isreal for the deaths of civilians in Palastine.

He replaced the image with one of the now-infamous Mohammed cartoons. If you want to hot-link… beware what happens!

Quite entertaining situation… even if the real story is a very sad situation, likely another fabrication of Isreali misbehavior.

del.icio.us:Snapped Shot Hotlinked digg:Snapped Shot Hotlinked spurl:Snapped Shot Hotlinked wists:Snapped Shot Hotlinked simpy:Snapped Shot Hotlinked newsvine:Snapped Shot Hotlinked blinklist:Snapped Shot Hotlinked furl:Snapped Shot Hotlinked reddit:Snapped Shot Hotlinked fark:Snapped Shot Hotlinked blogmarks:Snapped Shot Hotlinked Y!:Snapped Shot Hotlinked smarking:Snapped Shot Hotlinked magnolia:Snapped Shot Hotlinked segnalo:Snapped Shot Hotlinked

It seems that Debbie Schlussel is angry with Sean Hannity over his unattributed use of her original material over Imam Husham Al-Husainy repeatedly over several days on the Hannity & Colmes television show. [H/T: Independent Conservative who asks: Is Sean Hannity Stealing Your Content?]

Al-Husainy, of Dearborn, MI, was recently invited by Democrats to pray at their annual winter meeting. He has been previously identified as leading support for Hezbollah. Hannity, and others, are right to question that choice. Hot Air actually reports that the Imam’s prayer also implored God to “help us to stop the war and violence, and oppression and occupation.” [Any guesses which “occupation” is being referred to?]

Anyway, Debbie Schlussel has done extensive investigation on Al-Husainy, and it seems very puzzling why Hannity would not even acknowledge if this was the source of his material. The staff of H&C are free to book whatever guests they wish to comment on Al-Husainy they wish (even if the guest they choose might not be the most knowledgable source). But it’s unreasonable to use someone else’s work without at least acknowledging the source.

Let’s hope that H&C makes this right!

del.icio.us:Hannity Pilfering? digg:Hannity Pilfering? spurl:Hannity Pilfering? wists:Hannity Pilfering? simpy:Hannity Pilfering? newsvine:Hannity Pilfering? blinklist:Hannity Pilfering? furl:Hannity Pilfering? reddit:Hannity Pilfering? fark:Hannity Pilfering? blogmarks:Hannity Pilfering? Y!:Hannity Pilfering? smarking:Hannity Pilfering? magnolia:Hannity Pilfering? segnalo:Hannity Pilfering?

Michelle Malkin has a new column up today: A CBS Story “Too Important to Ignore”.

She describes the condemnation of the use of unnamed sources in news reports when it involved unsubstaniated claims about Barack Obama, but not when applied to things like the reports from Iraq or the Jamil Hussein/ Jamil Gholaiem Hussein / Jamail Hussein / Jamil Ghdaab Gulaim controversy.

She notes:

Let us contemplate some wisdom from a media ethics expert quoted by The New York Times this week:

“To most journalists, the notion of anonymous reporters relying on anonymous sources is a red flag. ‘If you want to talk about a business model that is designed to manufacture mischief in large volume, that would be it,’ said Ralph Whitehead Jr., a professor of journalism at the University of Massachusetts.”

CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier, left, addresses colleagues at CBS News headquarters, in New York Monday Jan. 29, 2007, exactly eight months after a car bomb in Baghdad severely injured her and killed her two CBS News crew members. CBS News and Sports President Sean McManus, second left, joined those welcoming Dozier back for her first visit. (AP Photo/Craig Blankenhorn, CBS) No, he wasn’t talking about the Associated Press’ (and the Washington Post’s and the Los Angeles Times’ and the New York Times’) anonymous stringers relying on unnamed and unreliable sources reporting (or rather, rumor-mongering) on the war in Iraq.

No, he wasn’t talking about the anonymous reporter identified only as “an Iraqi employee of The New York Times from Najaf” in three stories just this week, which quoted various unnamed Iraqi clerics, residents and officials.

No, Professor Whitehead was talking about the swiftly and widely discredited InsightMag.com story about Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., attending a madrassa as a child. Fox News Channel (for which I am a contributor — see, transparency’s not so hard) took a pounding for picking up the inaccurate story. The liberal media pile-on continues despite the network’s immediate acknowledgement of error in repeating the false charges and despite the fact that Fox didn’t originate the story.

Unlike, say, CBS News, Dan Rather and the faked National Guard memos.

She also describes the stories about an unaired CBS piece (only released via the web) by Lara Logan which appears to include unattributed video footage identical to that released by al Qaeda propagandists, although that charge has been denied as coincidence by CBS. You can read more about that at Michelle’s blog.

Dan Rather’s cry of ‘Fake but Accurate’ may indeed be the slogan that ends all credibility that media news sources have built up over the years. And anonymous ’sources’, regardless of the message they supposedly bring, are losing their trustworthiness.

del.icio.us:Anonymous Sources digg:Anonymous Sources spurl:Anonymous Sources wists:Anonymous Sources simpy:Anonymous Sources newsvine:Anonymous Sources blinklist:Anonymous Sources furl:Anonymous Sources reddit:Anonymous Sources fark:Anonymous Sources blogmarks:Anonymous Sources Y!:Anonymous Sources smarking:Anonymous Sources magnolia:Anonymous Sources segnalo:Anonymous Sources

There is a most excellent point by Vanishing American called “Squandering our riches”. Upon observing that some literary classics no longer appear on library shelves, they also address how the rules in many libraries are ignored and those who would have followed them ultimately move away from the library itself. It begins a cycle where the library no longer preserves the best, but is reduced to a place to hang out.

A piece from the post:

It’s another example of the broken windows theory: the idea that when a broken window is ignored and left unrepaired, the whole building and then the neighborhood falls to decay. So when a broken rule or two or three are ignored, pretty soon everybody has it figured out: the rules are not taken seriously, nobody will enforce them, and thus anything goes. Soon the rulebreakers are in control, while the rule-abiding people have to go elsewhere to escape the chaos, or resign themselves to it. Another obvious illustration of this theory is the abandonment of our borders.
But standards, rules, borders, they’re all so elitist, so yesterday, so Eurocentric.

It’s all a manifestation of the prevailing liberalism of our time: it’s deemed unfair and elitist to demand conformance to rules. Only legalistic prudes want rules enforced, and besides, who are we to judge others’ behavior? After all, homeless people have to bathe somewhere, and why not in the library? And who are we to judge those who want to view graphic porn openly on the library computers? Or read trashy ‘fotonovelas’ in the library? Or turn the library into a hangout and free sidewalk cafe?

The dumbing-down of libraries is just a part of the dumbing-down of our society, part of the leftist war against all standards, against excellence and achievement and civilization, really. Excellence, high achievement, such things are too exclusive, too hierarchical, and to leftists this is intolerable. Anything which does not ‘include’ everybody, which is not demotic and egalitarian, cannot be allowed.

Definitely read the whole thing!

del.icio.us:Libraries Beginning to Devolve digg:Libraries Beginning to Devolve spurl:Libraries Beginning to Devolve wists:Libraries Beginning to Devolve simpy:Libraries Beginning to Devolve newsvine:Libraries Beginning to Devolve blinklist:Libraries Beginning to Devolve furl:Libraries Beginning to Devolve reddit:Libraries Beginning to Devolve fark:Libraries Beginning to Devolve blogmarks:Libraries Beginning to Devolve Y!:Libraries Beginning to Devolve smarking:Libraries Beginning to Devolve magnolia:Libraries Beginning to Devolve segnalo:Libraries Beginning to Devolve

Yesterday I saw that the blog Alabama Liberation Front (formerly located at freealabamastan.blogspot.com) had been hijacked by a porn site. At first I wondered if Ali Bubba had been victim of a malicious attack (or worse yet, if the Associated Press had sent someone after him for calling them out on the Jamil Hussein fakery).

But it seems to be much worse, as Snapped Shot is reporting that Ali-Bubba is taking a forced leave from blogging.

I’m sad to have to say “farewell” to blogger-friend Ali Bubba (of the Alabama Liberation Front). Ali wrote today to say that due to potential issues with his company’s anti-blogging policy, he needed to hang up the hat for now. I wish you the best, Ali, and a Merry Christmas! Hopefully, you’ll be able to grace us with your eloquent prose again very soon!

Friends:

Two nights in a row, I’ve had nightmares in which the Alabama Liberation Front blog led to my being “dooced.” So I deleted it.

It’s Christmas, and my family needs my nights and weekends anyway.

The employment policies which currently prevent me from blogging in my own name are, in my opinion, stupid. But these are the terms of
my employment, and until those policies change, I risk too much by blogging anonymously.

When I return to the blogosphere — as I am sure I eventually will — I intend to do so under my own name. I hope I can count on your
assistance then.

Until then, once more: FREE ALABAMASTAN!

– ALI-BUBBA

So sad to see him go. Hopefully he’ll be back again soon!

del.icio.us:Free Ali-Bubba! digg:Free Ali-Bubba! spurl:Free Ali-Bubba! wists:Free Ali-Bubba! simpy:Free Ali-Bubba! newsvine:Free Ali-Bubba! blinklist:Free Ali-Bubba! furl:Free Ali-Bubba! reddit:Free Ali-Bubba! fark:Free Ali-Bubba! blogmarks:Free Ali-Bubba! Y!:Free Ali-Bubba! smarking:Free Ali-Bubba! magnolia:Free Ali-Bubba! segnalo:Free Ali-Bubba!

An old piece that’s still very relevant:

I am thankful for . . .
. . . . . the mess to clean after a party, because it means I have been surrounded by friends;
. . . . . the taxes I pay, because it means I have resources;
. . . . . the clothes that fit a little too snugly, because it means I have enough to eat;
. . . . . a lawn that needs mowing, windows that need cleaning, and gutters that need fixing, because it means I have a home;
. . . . . my shadow who watches me work, because it means I am out in the sunshine;
. . . . . the spot I find at the far end of the parking lot, because it means I am capable of walking;
. . . . . all the complaining about our government, because it means we have freedom of speech;
. . . . . my large heating bill, because it means I am warm;
. . . . . the person behind me in worship who sings off key, because it means I can hear;
. . . . . the alarm that goes off early in the morning, because it means I am alive;
. . . . . the piles of laundry and ironing, because it means my loved ones are near;
. . . . . weariness and aching muscles at the end of the day, because it means I have been productive.

As we take time to count our blessings today, don’t forget that sometimes there are many blessings in disguise.

del.icio.us:Thanksgiving digg:Thanksgiving spurl:Thanksgiving wists:Thanksgiving simpy:Thanksgiving newsvine:Thanksgiving blinklist:Thanksgiving furl:Thanksgiving reddit:Thanksgiving fark:Thanksgiving blogmarks:Thanksgiving Y!:Thanksgiving smarking:Thanksgiving magnolia:Thanksgiving segnalo:Thanksgiving

Peace be with you, BJ.

del.icio.us: digg: spurl: wists: simpy: newsvine: blinklist: furl: reddit: fark: blogmarks: Y!: smarking: magnolia: segnalo:

I had always heard the story about money being one of the dirtiest thing that we handle. And it makes a certain amount of sense.

Others seem to disagree, like this New Zealand report which says that at least bacteria levels are far lower than is commonly believed.

But this has to take the cake! Currency in Germany seems to be falling apart:

A mystery substance that caused some euro banknotes in Germany to fall to pieces may be linked to the party drug crystal speed, Der Spiegel magazine reported on Saturday, quoting regional police. Users of crystal speed inhale it through the nose using rolled-up banknotes and chemists think impurities such as sulphates, mingled with sweat, could have created an acid that ate away at the notes, the magazine quoted police as saying.

Around 1,500 banknotes worth between 5 euros and 100 euros ($6.44-$129) crumbled shortly after being withdrawn from cash machines, the Bundesbank said earlier this month.

Drug, sweat, and acid covered currency coming from the ATM. What will we have to worry about next?

del.icio.us:Money - hazardous for your health? digg:Money - hazardous for your health? spurl:Money - hazardous for your health? wists:Money - hazardous for your health? simpy:Money - hazardous for your health? newsvine:Money - hazardous for your health? blinklist:Money - hazardous for your health? furl:Money - hazardous for your health? reddit:Money - hazardous for your health? fark:Money - hazardous for your health? blogmarks:Money - hazardous for your health? Y!:Money - hazardous for your health? smarking:Money - hazardous for your health? magnolia:Money - hazardous for your health? segnalo:Money - hazardous for your health?

Don’t you know? The economy is terrible! Stock Market is up, consumer prices down, unemployment lower, oil prices far reduced over the summer. Isn’t that awful?

Monday the Associated Press released a story which ran in papers under a number of fairly depressing headlines:

  • Democrats Favored When Economy Uncertain [Editor’s Note: can someone please explain exactly when the economy is ever ‘certain’?]
  • Economic uncertainties give Democrats a boost
  • Democrats can handle economy better, poll suggests
  • Voters favor Democrats in handling uncertain economy
  • Democrats Favored Amid Uncertain Economy
  • Economic jitters benefit Dems.

I know that the writers are not the same people who write the headlines. But these don’t even seem to connect fully to the story. Anyway, once more, this is a story primarily reporting the results of an opinion poll. Regardless of the topic of the poll, this is something that immediately rubs me the wrong way. I don’t particularly care what a majority of 300 Americans care about on any topic, and I especially resent it being reported as “news”. I can see why it’s a favorite of reporters, however. You neither have to dig for facts nor do research. The whole “story” is about what some people “feel”. So you can throw in whatever other collection of loosely related thoughts you’d like along with the poll results. It’s not like anyone can correlate the information anyway.

In this case, the central theme of the article by Jeannine Aversa: “With the Nov. 7 elections looming, 59 percent of voters believe Democrats would do a better job handling the economy, while 39 percent prefer Republicans _ the party that controls Congress and the White House.”

The data from this poll are not yet available, so we can really not see much more about the poll questions or responses other than what was reported in this article. Despite what the headline writers seem to be suggesting, it doesn’t seem that the respondants necessarily thought the economy was “uncertain”. But just that Democrats would do a better job. Somehow.

“Wait a second!” you say. “Didn’t the Dow cross 12,000 just today?” Well, there’s an easy answer to the fact that times are good. Just look for bad stuff to come in the future!

Never mind that gasoline prices have started dropping, that the value of their 401(k)s rises with each new Dow Jones industrial average record, and that the interest rates on their credit cards and adjustable mortgages have leveled off for now.

“Even though the economy is doing well by some indicators, voters are still nervous about the economy,” said Costas Panagopoulos, a political science professor at Fordham University.

“They watched gas prices come down but watched them go up just as precipitously not too long ago. The stock market is doing well but that doesn’t mean it can’t come crashing down in days. Voters are reluctant to be overly confident about economic trends,” he said.

We’re left to wonder how Dr. Panagopoulos is able to know about the nervous nature of the American voter. It’s a wonder they aren’t more nervous after hearing his “glass-half-empty” worries: the stock market might crash and gas prices might shoot up again. He forgot to mention that fear, famine, plague, and pestilence might become pervasive throughout the Midwest just before Christmas.

I sure don’t know how these 741 voters came to answer the questions about the economy in this way. Maybe a better story would be to find out exactly why people feel this way in light of all of the positive economic conditions.

But the general population shouldn’t be concerned that economic pessimism and wealth-envy is spread by Democratic leadership:

“The Dow is up, but people’s retirements are less secure than ever. This economy is making the super rich richer, and leaving middle-class American families further behind,” countered House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

Democrats: Rooting for economic problems… and shouting “the sky is falling” (or maybe it will be someday soon).

del.icio.us:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! digg:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! spurl:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! wists:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! simpy:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! newsvine:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! blinklist:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! furl:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! reddit:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! fark:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! blogmarks:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! Y!:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! smarking:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! magnolia:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere! segnalo:Dow hits 12,000: Gloom Everywhere!

Next Page »