In yesterday’s Democratric Primary in South Carolina, John Edwards must have decided it was time to try to get a little play on the morning talk shows by throwing out

The president actually has to be able to do two things at once. This president thinks that his presidency is only about the war in terrorism, only about national security. Those things are critical for a commander in chief, but
there’s a lot that the president is not doing about jobs lost and about a health-care crisis in this country. The president has to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time.

Mr. Edwards, your little jab did get your mug on the TV today. And you might even do well enough in South Carolina to earn yourself a spot as Vice-President on the ticket, not that I could possibly understand what you bring in terms of Southern appeal except for the fact of your birthplace. But did you really need to go to this length? Not that you are alone in implying that Bush is stupid. Can you imagine the outrage that would have been caused if a Republican, let alone Bush, had made the same comment about one of these candidates. I guess we should get used to hearing this by now. It’s eagerly reported and repeated.

An interesting study of the 2000 campaign by journalism.org echoed what we already could see about the frequency with which Bush’s intelligence was questioned.

In Slander, Ann Coulter detailed how Republicans from Reagan to Bush are constantly derided for being stupid. A few of the best quotes:

If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they would be robbed of half their arguments. To be sure, they would still have "racist," "fascist," "homophobe," "ugly," and a few other highly nuanced arguments in the quiver. But the loss of "dumb" would nearly cripple them.

This is how six-year-olds argue: They call everything "stupid." The left’s primary argument is the angry reaction of a helpless child deprived of the ability to mount logical counterarguments. Someday we will turn to the New York Times editorial page and find the Newspaper of Record denouncing President Bush for being a ‘penis-head.’

Most preposterously, the New York Times reported — as if it were news — "With his grades and college boards, Mr. Bush might not have been admitted [to Yale] if he had applied just a few years later." "Might not have been admitted"? What on earth does that mean? Bush also "might not have been admitted" if he had dropped out of high school and become a Gangsta Rapper. It so galls Northeastern liberals that Republican George Bush went to an Ivy League school, they can’t resist publicly fantasizing about an alternative universe in which Yale rejects him.

But the most accurate statement from Ann Coulter was this: "’Stupid’ means one thing: ‘threatening to the interests of the Democratic Party.’ The more Conservative the Republican, the more vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be.".

I guess John Edwards just couldn’t help himself.

del.icio.us:Sound Bites from South Carolina digg:Sound Bites from South Carolina spurl:Sound Bites from South Carolina wists:Sound Bites from South Carolina simpy:Sound Bites from South Carolina newsvine:Sound Bites from South Carolina blinklist:Sound Bites from South Carolina furl:Sound Bites from South Carolina reddit:Sound Bites from South Carolina fark:Sound Bites from South Carolina blogmarks:Sound Bites from South Carolina Y!:Sound Bites from South Carolina smarking:Sound Bites from South Carolina magnolia:Sound Bites from South Carolina segnalo:Sound Bites from South Carolina