January 2004


In yesterday’s Democratric Primary in South Carolina, John Edwards must have decided it was time to try to get a little play on the morning talk shows by throwing out

The president actually has to be able to do two things at once. This president thinks that his presidency is only about the war in terrorism, only about national security. Those things are critical for a commander in chief, but
there’s a lot that the president is not doing about jobs lost and about a health-care crisis in this country. The president has to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time.

Mr. Edwards, your little jab did get your mug on the TV today. And you might even do well enough in South Carolina to earn yourself a spot as Vice-President on the ticket, not that I could possibly understand what you bring in terms of Southern appeal except for the fact of your birthplace. But did you really need to go to this length? Not that you are alone in implying that Bush is stupid. Can you imagine the outrage that would have been caused if a Republican, let alone Bush, had made the same comment about one of these candidates. I guess we should get used to hearing this by now. It’s eagerly reported and repeated.

An interesting study of the 2000 campaign by journalism.org echoed what we already could see about the frequency with which Bush’s intelligence was questioned.

In Slander, Ann Coulter detailed how Republicans from Reagan to Bush are constantly derided for being stupid. A few of the best quotes:

If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they would be robbed of half their arguments. To be sure, they would still have "racist," "fascist," "homophobe," "ugly," and a few other highly nuanced arguments in the quiver. But the loss of "dumb" would nearly cripple them.

This is how six-year-olds argue: They call everything "stupid." The left’s primary argument is the angry reaction of a helpless child deprived of the ability to mount logical counterarguments. Someday we will turn to the New York Times editorial page and find the Newspaper of Record denouncing President Bush for being a ‘penis-head.’

Most preposterously, the New York Times reported — as if it were news — "With his grades and college boards, Mr. Bush might not have been admitted [to Yale] if he had applied just a few years later." "Might not have been admitted"? What on earth does that mean? Bush also "might not have been admitted" if he had dropped out of high school and become a Gangsta Rapper. It so galls Northeastern liberals that Republican George Bush went to an Ivy League school, they can’t resist publicly fantasizing about an alternative universe in which Yale rejects him.

But the most accurate statement from Ann Coulter was this: "’Stupid’ means one thing: ‘threatening to the interests of the Democratic Party.’ The more Conservative the Republican, the more vicious and hysterical the attacks on his intelligence will be.".

I guess John Edwards just couldn’t help himself.

del.icio.us:Sound Bites from South Carolina digg:Sound Bites from South Carolina spurl:Sound Bites from South Carolina wists:Sound Bites from South Carolina simpy:Sound Bites from South Carolina newsvine:Sound Bites from South Carolina blinklist:Sound Bites from South Carolina furl:Sound Bites from South Carolina reddit:Sound Bites from South Carolina fark:Sound Bites from South Carolina blogmarks:Sound Bites from South Carolina Y!:Sound Bites from South Carolina smarking:Sound Bites from South Carolina magnolia:Sound Bites from South Carolina segnalo:Sound Bites from South Carolina

So New Hampshire has spoken. John Kerry is 2 for 2 and rolling along on his way to the nomination. (Again I will remind you of the names Paul Tsongas, Gary Hart, Edmund Muskie, Tom Harkin, and Richard Gephardt… but so much for the New Hampshire and Iowa handicapping.) But Kerry is now officially the ‘front-runner’. He better get ready for the assult. Once the honeymoon is over (and it usually doesn’t take long), he will become the lightning rod.

Interestingly, Kerry apparently is not that interested in campaigning in the South, apparently feeling that it should be either given over to the Republicans or perhaps that it’s not worthy of his attention (Forget the South? Frontrunner Kerry Downplays Importance of Region Many Democrats See as Crucial). Believe me, I am a just a transplanted Yankee here, but I think this is a big mistake. Not necessarily for his quest for nomination, but as a long-term election strategy. According to the story:

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., is discounting notions that any Democratic
candidate would have to appeal to Southern voters in order to win the presidency, calling such thinking a "mistake" during a speech at Dartmouth College.

Kerry’s remarks Saturday were so starkly antithetical to how many southern Democrats feel their party should campaign for the presidency, that a former South Carolina state Democratic chairman told ABCNEWS that Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-S.C., who endorsed Kerry last week, perhaps "ought to reconsider his endorsement."

During a town hall meeting on the Dartmouth campus, Kerry noted that former Vice President Al Gore would be president if he’d won any number of other non-Southern states in 2000, including New Hampshire, West Virginia, and Ohio.

"Everybody always makes the mistake of looking South," Kerry said, in response to a question about winning the region. "Al Gore proved he could have been president of the United States without winning one Southern state, including his own."

Perhaps John doesn’t realize it, but if Al Gore had managed to win a single Southern state he would have actually been President right now, instead of sitting home (probably not in his home state of Tennessee) crying about the Electoral College and recounting Florida’s hanging chads in his dreams. And don’t forget that the last three Democratic Presidents were all from the South.

I don’t know that I appreciated Zell Miller properly when he was Governor of Georgia. I know I was mad when then Governor Roy Barnes appointed Zell to fill the term of Republican Paul Coverdell when died in office. When Zell promised to actually vote his conscience and try to follow the wishes of those he represented, he really kept his word. It certainly would have been easier to allow the trappings of office overtake that. Of course, now he is disowned from the Democratic Party and gains little praise from the Democratic establishment, such as Jimmy Carter (Carter: Miller’s Senate appointment was ‘mistake’ ).

In his book, A National Party No More Zell outlines how the Democratic Party has slid to the left through the years and lost touch with the South. If you haven’t read it, you should. So should Kerry (if he doesn’t want to buy it, he should just read the excerpts here and here.

Once upon a time, the most successful Democratic leader of them all, FDR, looked south and said, "I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished." Today our national Democratic leaders look south and say, "I see one-third of a nation and it can go to hell."

Give ‘em hell, Zell.

del.icio.us:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' digg:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' spurl:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' wists:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' simpy:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' newsvine:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' blinklist:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' furl:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' reddit:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' fark:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' blogmarks:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' Y!:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' smarking:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' magnolia:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South' segnalo:Kerry Steers Clear of 'South'

No one has ever accused the Atlanta City Council of being anything other than transparent. The entire city government appears to exist only as one tool in the corrupt game of funneling money and favors. Just weeks after the Council enacted tougher rules forcing bars to close earlier, supposedly reacting to safety issues at the Buckhead bar scene, it has since been revealed that many bars and restaurants are agreeing to move into Underground Atlanta, a city-owned mall complex that has tried to be a tourist attraction but only been able to lose money (Underground after dark. Plan to make downtown attraction a center of night life sparks excitement). Why is there suddenly so much excitement? Well it seems the bars in the Underground mysteriously are not subject to the earlier closing time and can stay open until 4 am. It’s not just suspicious, it’s outragous. If you want to have an earlier closing time in order really as a safety measure, then that’s fine. But it’s certainly not any safer at Underground Atlanta at that time!!! The laws of the city are tailored against private business in order to gain city (and certain priviate individuals) profit. A disgrace. If they want to be in the business of entertainment (and I can not imagine why the City of Atlanta should be using taxpayer money in this way), at least don’t try to legislate an advantage where you could not otherwise compete.

But the City is not just happy trying to affect the flow of commerce within its boundaries. Atlanta’s Druid Hills Golf Course is about to have to do battle with the city (Atlanta Country Club Accused of Discrimination). Two gay members of the club are challenging that the private club’s bylaws allow members’ spouses to play without guest fees but it doesn’t extend spousal benefits to gay life partners. It’s a private club, you might say. The club does not bar gay members, and they knew the policy when tyey joined, you might note. But don’t forget this is government. The City Council of Atlanta knows better. There have been threats that the city may revoke the country club’s business and liquor licenses because the club is "in violation of the city’s non-discrimination ordinance". If we don’t like your policies, you have to change your private club. Welcome to the city of Atlanta.

del.icio.us:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life digg:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life spurl:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life wists:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life simpy:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life newsvine:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life blinklist:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life furl:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life reddit:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life fark:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life blogmarks:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life Y!:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life smarking:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life magnolia:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life segnalo:City of Atlanta medles in Business and Private Life

Reading the newspaper can sure be a blood-pressure check sometimes. Today, the AJC featured a story by Rick Badie that sure got my heart pumping (‘Illegal’: Slur or accurate label?). The central thesis (repeated four or five times) was that using the term "illegal alien" is offensive. You see, "undocumented" doesn’t sound so bad, at least according to activist Jerry Gonzalez. Because it’s so unbelievable, you have to read it for yourself:

For Jerry Gonzalez, the term "illegal immigrant" packs as much vitriol as some racial slurs.

Many Latinos, he said, find it offensive.

"It’s easy to dismiss someone when you use a disparaging term such as ‘illegal immigrant’ or ‘illegal alien,’ " surmised Gonzalez, who oversees the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, an Atlanta-based political action committee.

"I can’t speak for other immigrant groups," he said, "but on behalf of the Latino community, many people I speak to on a day-to-day basis think it serves to dehumanize the person, makes them less than human. Similar to the way the n-word was used to dehumanize African-Americans."

It’s not a pressing matter for the association, but the issue of what to call the state’s 228,000 illegal immigrants has taken up space on the group’s 2004 legislative agenda.

Gonzalez, the executive director, plans to lobby state lawmakers to use the term "undocumented workers" when talking about Mexicans and other foreigners here illegally.

"It’s a more accurate reflection of people who provide a great deal for the economy," he said.

Are you kidding me? Talk about failing the common sense test here. If there isn’t a person offended by comparing ‘illegal alien’ to the ‘n-word’, they just don’t have a pulse.

You are here, but not a citizen. That’s an alien. You do not comply with immigration rules. That’s illegal.

And this is just one day after reports from the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (more commonly known as the 9/11 Panel) condem a lack immigration rules enforcement as a major contributing factor to providing terrorists access for commiting their crimes (Sept. 11 Panel Looks at Border Security).

I know that there are many millions of people here, and most may just be looking for a better life. But you can’t change the fact that they are here illegally. I’m sorry if that makes someone uncomfortable to be labelled. Either we get serious and enforce the rules or forget about security at all.

del.icio.us:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? digg:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? spurl:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? wists:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? simpy:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? newsvine:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? blinklist:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? furl:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? reddit:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? fark:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? blogmarks:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? Y!:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? smarking:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? magnolia:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'? segnalo:Illegal, or just 'Rules Challenged'?

Today, the AJC reported the good news (Illegal immigrants get a shot at college with scholarships). It seems that Georgia State University has decided to award four full-ride scholarships to illegal immigrants who are graduating from public high schools this year.

At least they are trying to provide assistance based on academic performance. And I think that it’s great that the kids have been able to achieve and just desire to better themselves. That does not change the fact that the status of their families is illegal. They broke the immigration rules. I don’t blame them for wanting to have a better life… but there should be no reward for making a mockery of the immigration and border control policies. It doesn’t give you "undocumented status" - it is the status of criminal. Not necessarily a bad person, but one who should go through the proper channels in order to work within the system. This is not a victimless crime here - someone else is deprived of a scholarship in this case.

The main tenets of the arguments for granting financial assistance for illegals aliens is that they don’t qualify for in-state tuition and they are otherwise unable to apply for financial assistance. As well they should have difficulty, because they are, in fact, illegal. Taxpayer money should not be sponsoring such an endeavor.

A few days ago, I mentioned that the amnesty program being suggested by Bush was a bad idea, rewarding those who have already managed to break the rules. Administration officials seeks to temper the program by saying that it does not give a fast track to citizenship, just allows ‘undocumented’ people to become ‘documented’ in some way. But the fact of the matter is, it is simply opening the door wider. From the same AJC article: "Advocates for the policies were encouraged by President Bush’s recent proposal to allow undocumented workers to obtain legal, if temporary, status. They hope the president’s stance bodes well for a federal bill that would grant undocumented students in-state tuition and a chance to apply for legal status.&quot. Give an inch and take a…

In the state of Georgia, there is a program called the HOPE Scholarship. Funded (at least originally) from lottery proceeds, it turned the ‘tax on the math-challenged’ into a positive effect - sponsoring tuition, fees and books for students who have received Bs or better in their core academic subjects in high school as long as they maintain at least a B average in a Georgia state college. This certainly has enabled many kids who otherwise may not have had a chance to go to college the ability to get to school. Along the way, it has also lead to grade inflation in high schools since teachers, with best intentions, did not want to be the barrier to a child’s higher education by not issuing a ‘B’. But because of this, there is now a financial shortfall predicted for HOPE. Any suggestions for reform in the system to tie to other academic indicators (such as SAT score - something that Georgia gets embarrased about each year), are hailed as either racist or benefiting the "rich". It’s fine to make a consideration for the economic capabilities of the family. But academic performance should also be a key indicator. And if you somehow earned a ‘B’, but can’t meet certain minimum standards, then there’s something wrong.

Right now Tony Blair is facing very harsh criticsm in the UK, not because of Iraq or some other foreign policy issue, but because he proposed a system of "top-up fees". Blair is proposing that a government mandated tuition fee system to any school strictly based on family income to a scheme that would raise funding for universities by allowing universities to charge their own fees (still strictly controlled by the government). Even the idea that a student would have to take out a no-interest loan and pay it back only when they had sufficient yearly income has been critically viewed in the UK.

Attendance in college is not a right. It is work. It is a luxury. And it’s something that we have been very blessed to have here in America. But we need to keep it in perspective. It’s not free.

del.icio.us:Paying For College digg:Paying For College spurl:Paying For College wists:Paying For College simpy:Paying For College newsvine:Paying For College blinklist:Paying For College furl:Paying For College reddit:Paying For College fark:Paying For College blogmarks:Paying For College Y!:Paying For College smarking:Paying For College magnolia:Paying For College segnalo:Paying For College

Howard Dean seemed to do much more than inspire his campaign workers with his outburst. Did he wreck his chances for the nomination?

For an excellent column describing why Howard Dean had his surprise third place finish in Iowa, check out George Will this wekk (How the Iowans Wised Up to Dean). As he states: "Dean is a problematic product because the fuel that launched his rocket — a combustible brew of anger, pugnacity, moral vanity and intellectual condescension — severely limits the apogee of his trajectory. Television enforces intimacy with candidates and presidents — they are in America’s homes nightly. Many intense Democrats have had the fun of picnicking on Dean’s ideological red meat but are now flinching from the prospect of having, or of asking less-partisan Americans to have, prolonged intimacy with Dean’s sandpapery personality and equally abrasive agenda. "

When all you really have is an intense hatred of a single person (in this case Bush) - exactly how far can that take you?

I don’t think Dean is finished, but the media, like the sharks smelling some blood in the water, are enjoying the "sudden" resurgance of Kerry which actually makes it a race. New Hampshire suddenly becomes ‘must-win’.

Dean’s real trouble is not with these people. The real destructive nature of his screaming outburst was not just heard by listeners to Rush Limbaugh or viewers of FOX News. No, every single morning radio show and late-night comic can play it over and over, set it to music, repeat it over and over. When you reach Howard Stern and MTV, it’s much more problematic. Most people weren’t paying attention to Iowa, unless they lived in Des Molines. American Idol was starting its new season after all. But now everyone has heard Howard Dean lose it. It’s not a sound easily forgottten.

del.icio.us:Dean's Rebel Yell digg:Dean's Rebel Yell spurl:Dean's Rebel Yell wists:Dean's Rebel Yell simpy:Dean's Rebel Yell newsvine:Dean's Rebel Yell blinklist:Dean's Rebel Yell furl:Dean's Rebel Yell reddit:Dean's Rebel Yell fark:Dean's Rebel Yell blogmarks:Dean's Rebel Yell Y!:Dean's Rebel Yell smarking:Dean's Rebel Yell magnolia:Dean's Rebel Yell segnalo:Dean's Rebel Yell

State of the Union Speech, delivered January 20, 2004:

Mr. Speaker, Vice President Cheney, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:

America this evening is a nation called to great responsibilities. And we are rising to meet them.

As we gather tonight, hundreds of thousands of American servicemen and women are deployed across the world in the war on terror. By bringing hope to the oppressed, and delivering justice to the violent, they are making America more secure.

Each day, law enforcement personnel and intelligence officers are tracking terrorist threats; analysts are examining airline passenger lists; the men and women of our new Homeland Security Department are patrolling our coasts and borders. And their vigilance is protecting America.

Americans are proving once again to be the hardest working people in the world. The American economy is growing stronger. The tax relief you passed is working.

Tonight, members of Congress can take pride in great works of compassion and reform that skeptics had thought impossible. You are raising the standards of our public schools; and you are giving our senior citizens prescription drug coverage under Medicare.

We have faced serious challenges together and now we face a choice. We can go forward with confidence and resolve or we can turn back to the dangerous illusion that terrorists are not plotting and outlaw regimes are no threat to us. We can press on with economic growth, and reforms in education and Medicare or we can turn back to the old policies and old divisions.

We have not come all this way through tragedy, and trial, and war only to falter and leave our work unfinished. Americans are rising to the tasks of history, and they expect the same of us. In their efforts, their enterprise, and their character, the American people are showing that the state of our union is confident and strong.

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil — and it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting and false.

The killing has continued in Bali, Jakarta, Casablanca, Riyadh, Mombassa, Jerusalem, Istanbul, and Baghdad. The terrorists continue to plot against America and the civilized world. And by our will and courage, this danger will be defeated.

Inside the United States, where the war began, we must continue to give homeland security and law enforcement personnel every tool they need to defend us. And one of those essential tools is the Patriot Act, which allows federal law enforcement to better share information, to track terrorists, to disrupt their cells, and to seize their assets.

For years, we have used similar provisions to catch embezzlers and drug traffickers. If these methods are good for hunting criminals, they are even more important for hunting terrorists. Key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year. The terrorist threat will not expire on that schedule. Our law enforcement needs this vital legislation to protect our citizens you need to renew the Patriot Act.

America is on the offensive against the terrorists who started this war. Last March, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a mastermind of September 11th, awoke to find himself in the custody of U.S. and Pakistani authorities.

Last August 11th brought the capture of the terrorist Hambali, who was a key player in the attack in Indonesia that killed over 200 people. We are tracking Al Qaeda around the world and nearly two-thirds of their known leaders have now been captured or killed. Thousands of very skilled and determined military personnel are on a manhunt, going after the remaining killers who hide in cities and caves and, one by one, we will bring the terrorists to justice.

As part of the offensive against terror, we are also confronting the regimes that harbor and support terrorists, and could supply them with nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. The United States and our allies are determined: We refuse to live in the shadow of this ultimate danger.

The first to see our determination were the Taliban, who made Afghanistan the primary training base of Al Qaeda killers. As of this month, that country has a new constitution, guaranteeing free elections and full participation by women. Businesses are opening, health care centers are being established, and the boys and girls of Afghanistan are back in school. With help from the new Afghan Army, our coalition is leading aggressive raids against surviving members of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

The men and women of Afghanistan are building a nation that is free, and proud, and fighting terror and America is honored to be their friend.

Since we last met in this chamber, combat forces of the United States, Great Britain, Australia, Poland, and other countries enforced the demands of the United Nations, ended the rule of Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq are free. Having broken the Baathist regime, we face a remnant of violent Saddam supporters. Men who ran away from our troops in battle are now dispersed and attack from the shadows.

These killers, joined by foreign terrorists, are a serious, continuing danger. Yet we are making progress against them. The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day, and conducting an average of 180 raids every week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein’s evil regime.

The work of building a new Iraq is hard, and it is right. And America has always been willing to do what it takes for what is right.

Last January, Iraq’s only law was the whim of one brutal man. Today our coalition is working with the Iraqi Governing Council to draft a basic law, with a bill of rights. We are working with Iraqis and the United Nations to prepare for a transition to full Iraqi sovereignty by the end of June.

As democracy takes hold in Iraq, the enemies of freedom will do all in their power to spread violence and fear. They are trying to shake the will of our country and our friends but the United States of America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins. The killers will fail, and the Iraqi people will live in freedom.

Month by month, Iraqis are assuming more responsibility for their own security and their own future. And tonight we are honored to welcome one of Iraq’s most respected leaders: the current President of the Iraqi Governing Council, Adnan Pachachi. Sir, America stands with you and the Iraqi people as you build a free and peaceful nation.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime’s weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

Colonel Qadhafi correctly judged that his country would be better off, and far more secure, without weapons of mass murder. Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Different threats require different strategies. Along with nations in the region, we are insisting that North Korea eliminate its nuclear program. America and the international community are demanding that Iran meet its commitments and not develop nuclear weapons. America is committed to keeping the world’s most dangerous weapons out of the hands of the world’s most dangerous regimes.

When I came to this rostrum on September 20th, 2001, I brought the police shield of a fallen officer, my reminder of lives that ended, and a task that does not end. I gave to you and to all Americans my complete commitment to securing our country and defeating our enemies. And this pledge, given by one, has been kept by many. You in the Congress have provided the resources for our defense, and cast the difficult votes of war and peace.

Our closest allies have been unwavering. America’s intelligence personnel and diplomats have been skilled and tireless. And the men and women of the American military they have taken the hardest duty. We have seen their skill and courage in armored charges, and midnight raids, and lonely hours on faithful watch. We have seen the joy when they return, and felt the sorrow when one is lost. I have had the honor of meeting our servicemen and women at many posts, from the deck of a carrier in the Pacific, to a mess hall in Baghdad.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted, tried, convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States and war is what they got.

Some in this chamber, and in our country, did not support the liberation of Iraq. Objections to war often come from principled motives.

But let us be candid about the consequences of leaving Saddam Hussein in power. We are seeking all the facts already the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations.

Had we failed to act, the dictator’s weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day. Had we failed to act, Security Council resolutions on Iraq would have been revealed as empty threats, weakening the United Nations and encouraging defiance by dictators around the world. Iraq’s torture chambers would still be filled with victims terrified and innocent. The killing fields of Iraq, where hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children vanished into the sands, would still be known only to the killers. For all who love freedom and peace, the world without Saddam Hussein’s regime is a better and safer place.

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands, Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

As long as the Middle East remains a place of tyranny, despair, and anger, it will continue to produce men and movements that threaten the safety of America and our friends. So America is pursuing a forward strategy of freedom in the greater Middle East. We will challenge the enemies of reform, confront the allies of terror, and expect a higher standard from our friends. To cut through the barriers of hateful propaganda, the Voice of America and other broadcast services are expanding their programming in Arabic and Persian, and soon, a new television service will begin providing reliable news and information across the region.

I will send you a proposal to double the budget of the National Endowment for Democracy, and to focus its new work on the development of free elections, free markets, free press, and free labor unions in the Middle East. And above all, we will finish the historic work of democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq, so those nations can light the way for others, and help transform a troubled part of the world.

America is a nation with a mission, and that mission comes from our most basic beliefs. We have no desire to dominate, no ambitions of empire.

Our aim is a democratic peace, a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman. America acts in this cause with friends and allies at our side, yet we understand our special calling: This great republic will lead the cause of freedom.

In these last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from 500 to a thousand dollars, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years. New home construction: the highest in almost 20 years. Home ownership rates: the highest ever.

Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high. And jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have, and you were right to return it.

America’s growing economy is also a changing economy. As technology transforms the way almost every job is done, America becomes more productive, and workers need new skills. Much of our job growth will be found in high-skilled fields like health care and biotechnology. So we must respond by helping more Americans gain the skills to find good jobs in our new economy.

All skills begin with the basics of reading and math, which are supposed to be learned in the early grades of our schools. Yet for too long, for too many children, those skills were never mastered. By passing the No Child Left Behind Act, you have made the expectation of literacy the law of our country. We are providing more funding for our schools, a 36 percent increase since 2001. We are requiring higher standards. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing. We are making progress toward excellence for every child.

But the status quo always has defenders. Some want to undermine the No Child Left Behind Act by weakening standards and accountability. Yet the results we require are really a matter of common sense: We expect third graders to read and do math at third grade level, and that is not asking too much. Testing is the only way to identify and help students who are falling behind.

This nation will not go back to the days of simply shuffling children along from grade to grade without them learning the basics. I refuse to give up on any child, and the No Child Left Behind Act is opening the door of opportunity to all of America’s children.

At the same time, we must ensure that older students and adults can gain the skills they need to find work now. Many of the fastest-growing occupations require strong math and science preparation, and training beyond the high school level. So tonight I propose a series of measures called Jobs for the 21st Century. This program will provide extra help to middle- and high school students who fall behind in reading and math, expand Advanced Placement programs in low-income schools, and invite math and science professionals from the private sector to teach part-time in our high schools.

I propose larger Pell Grants for students who prepare for college with demanding courses in high school. I propose increasing our support for America’s fine community colleges, so they can train workers for the industries that are creating the most new jobs. By all these actions, we will help more and more Americans to join in the growing prosperity of our country.

Job training is important, and so is job creation. We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda.

Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged 300 dollars more in Federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase.

What the Congress has given, the Congress should not take away: For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless Federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits. Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run, so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy. My administration is promoting free and fair trade, to open up new markets for America’s entrepreneurs, and manufacturers, and farmers, and to create jobs for America’s workers.

Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

And we should limit the burden of government on this economy by acting as good stewards of taxpayer dollars. In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent.

This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people’s money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight I also ask you to reform our immigration laws, so they reflect our values and benefit our economy. I propose a new temporary worker program to match willing foreign workers with willing employers, when no Americans can be found to fill the job. This reform will be good for our economy because employers will find needed workers in an honest and orderly system. A temporary worker program will help protect our homeland, allowing border patrol and law enforcement to focus on true threats to our national security.

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

Our nation’s health care system, like our economy, is also in a time of change. Amazing medical technologies are improving and saving lives.

This dramatic progress has brought its own challenge, in the rising costs of medical care and health insurance. Members of Congress, we must work together to help control those costs and extend the benefits of modern medicine throughout our country.

Meeting these goals requires bipartisan effort, and two months ago, you showed the way. By strengthening Medicare and adding a prescription drug benefit, you kept a basic commitment to our seniors: You are giving them the modern medicine they deserve.

Starting this year, under the law you passed, seniors can choose to receive a drug discount card, saving them 10 to 25 percent off the retail price of most prescription drugs, and millions of low-income seniors can get an additional $600 to buy medicine. Beginning next year, seniors will have new coverage for preventive screenings against diabetes and heart disease, and seniors just entering Medicare can receive wellness exams.

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about 35 dollars, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best, just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses, in a health savings account.

I signed this measure proudly, and any attempt to limit the choices of our seniors, or to take away their prescription drug coverage under Medicare, will meet my veto.

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs. To make insurance more affordable, Congress must act to address rapidly rising health care costs. Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance, I urge you to pass Association Health Plans.

I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance. By computerizing health records, we can avoid dangerous medical mistakes, reduce costs, and improve care. To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America’s health care the best in the world.

We are living in a time of great change in our world, in our economy, and in science and medicine. Yet some things endure — courage and compassion, reverence and integrity, respect for differences of faith and race. The values we try to live by never change. And they are instilled in us by fundamental institutions, such as families, and schools, and religious congregations.

These institutions, the unseen pillars of civilization, must remain strong in America, and we will defend them.

We must stand with our families to help them raise healthy, responsible children. And when it comes to helping children make right choices, there is work for all of us to do.

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem, with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement.

Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the past two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001. In my budget, I have proposed new funding to continue our aggressive, community-based strategy to reduce demand for illegal drugs.

Drug testing in our schools has proven to be an effective part of this effort. So tonight I propose an additional 23 million dollars for schools that want to use drug testing as a tool to save children’s lives. The aim here is not to punish children, but to send them this message: We love you, and we don’t want to lose you.

To help children make right choices, they need good examples. Athletics play such an important role in our society, but, unfortunately, some in professional sports are not setting much of an example. The use of performance-enhancing drugs like steroids in baseball, football, and other sports is dangerous, and it sends the wrong message — that there are shortcuts to accomplishment, and that performance is more important than character. So tonight I call on team owners, union representatives, coaches, and players to take the lead, to send the right signal, to get tough, and to get rid of steroids now.

To encourage right choices, we must be willing to confront the dangers young people face, even when they are difficult to talk about. Each year, about three million teenagers contract sexually transmitted diseases that can harm them, or kill them, or prevent them from ever becoming parents. In my budget, I propose a grassroots campaign to help inform families about these medical risks. We will double federal funding for abstinence programs, so schools can teach this fact of life: Abstinence for young people is the only certain way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases.

Decisions children make now can affect their health and character for the rest of their lives. All of us — parents, schools, government — must work together to counter the negative influence of the culture, and to send the right messages to our children.

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization.

Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under Federal law as the union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people’s voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

The outcome of this debate is important, and so is the way we conduct it. The same moral tradition that defines marriage also teaches that each individual has dignity and value in God’s sight.

It is also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America’s religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country, mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups just because they have a cross or Star of David or crescent on the wall.

By Executive Order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

In the past, we have worked together to bring mentors to the children of prisoners, and provide treatment for the addicted, and help for the homeless. Tonight I ask you to consider another group of Americans in need of help. This year, some 600,000 inmates will be released from prison back into society. We know from long experience that if they can’t find work, or a home, or help, they are much more likely to commit more crimes and return to prison.

So tonight, I propose a four-year, $300 million Prisoner Re-Entry Initiative to expand job training and placement services, to provide transitional housing, and to help newly released prisoners get mentoring, including from faith-based groups. America is the land of the second chance and when the gates of the prison open, the path ahead should lead to a better life.

For all Americans, the last three years have brought tests we did not ask for, and achievements shared by all. By our actions, we have shown what kind of nation we are. In grief, we found the grace to go on. In challenge, we rediscovered the courage and daring of a free people. In victory, we have shown the noble aims and good heart of America. And having come this far, we sense that we live in a time set apart.

I have been a witness to the character of the American people, who have shown calm in times of danger, compassion for one another, and toughness for the long haul. All of us have been partners in a great enterprise. And even some of the youngest understand that we are living in historic times. Last month a girl in Lincoln, Rhode Island, sent me a letter.

It began, "Dear George W. Bush." "If there is anything you know, I, Ashley Pearson, age 10, can do to help anyone, please send me a letter and tell me what I can do to save our country." She added this P.S.: "If you can send a letter to the troops ? please put, ‘Ashley Pearson believes in you.’"

Tonight, Ashley, your message to our troops has just been conveyed. And yes, you have some duties yourself. Study hard in school, listen to your mom and dad, help someone in need, and when you and your friends see a man or woman in uniform, say "thank you." And while you do your part, all of us here in this great chamber will do our best to keep you and the rest of America safe and free.

My fellow citizens, we now move forward, with confidence and faith. Our nation is strong and steadfast. The cause we serve is right, because it is the cause of all mankind. The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable, and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power Who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

May God bless the United States of America. Thank you.

del.icio.us:2004 State of the Union digg:2004 State of the Union spurl:2004 State of the Union wists:2004 State of the Union simpy:2004 State of the Union newsvine:2004 State of the Union blinklist:2004 State of the Union furl:2004 State of the Union reddit:2004 State of the Union fark:2004 State of the Union blogmarks:2004 State of the Union Y!:2004 State of the Union smarking:2004 State of the Union magnolia:2004 State of the Union segnalo:2004 State of the Union

Well the race in Iowa is over, and it didn’t end up in the four-way tie in the way predicted the day before in the polls. It seems that polling is everywhere these days. The "instant poll" is surveyed on almost every issue, perhaps spurred on by the immediacy and ease of collecting input via the web. The poll is not just a part of prediciting the outcome of political races, but indeed shaping public perception.

Over the last week, scandal errupted at Cal State University, because the judge in the Scott Peterson murder trial agreed with the defendant’s request to a change in venue and, among other things, sited a survey showing indicating that residents in the area were predisposed to assuming Scott Peterson guilty. Now it has come to light that the survey was not done correctly - survey results were fabricated, and this probably was not the first time. Did the survey play an overwhelming part in the decision to move the trial? Probably not this time. But it does show that there is obvious room for serious misuse if ethics are abused.

With regards to election polls, the National Council on Public Polls asserts that it’s not so much a problem with the accuracy of polls or the way they are done, but rather how they are reported and the results interpreted.

A final thought from Kansas State Professor William Richter: "Although most public opinion polls we see are as accurate as they can be, people tend to treat the numbers more realistically than they probably should. They need to remember it’s just a fuzzy snapshot."

del.icio.us:Should we believe the polls? digg:Should we believe the polls? spurl:Should we believe the polls? wists:Should we believe the polls? simpy:Should we believe the polls? newsvine:Should we believe the polls? blinklist:Should we believe the polls? furl:Should we believe the polls? reddit:Should we believe the polls? fark:Should we believe the polls? blogmarks:Should we believe the polls? Y!:Should we believe the polls? smarking:Should we believe the polls? magnolia:Should we believe the polls? segnalo:Should we believe the polls?

So Howard Dean made his quick trip to Plains, GA over the weekend to visit with Jimmy Carter.

Now I believe that Jimmy Carter is a fine man and a devout Christian, and a good example for us all, especially when dealing with fellow man. Except, that is, when it comes to the area of foreign policy. If that wasn’t clear during his term as President, it has been exceedingly clear since then. With such breakthroughs as support for Castro and any other anti-American dictator, he has lost touch with reality. Perhaps it is a delayed reaction to realizing that the Soviet Union did actually exist and could be beat, instead of refusing to admit there was something to confront and do something more than to keep the athletes home from the Olympics. But Carter has been an active ex-President, such as being sent to far-off places to monitor their elections. And no one can deny that he is a Nobel Peace Prize winner (even if, it turns out, to have been awarded less to honor Carter but more to criticize Bush - or as the head of the committee Gunnar Berge was quoted: "With the position Carter has taken on this, it can and must also be seen as criticism of the line the current U.S. administration has taken on Iraq.")

So with Carter’s outspoken opposition to the war in Iraq, it’s no surprise why Howard Dean might want to piggy-back on Carter’s position. Never mind that earlier last week it was pre-emptively reported that Carter would not actually be endorising Dean (quoted as "This meeting is not an endorsement of his candidacy, but an opportunity for me to learn more about the candidate and his views."). But nevertheless, it seemed to be presented as though Dean needed to quickly journey to Georgia for the big announcement. Surely the timing was such that, at least to a casual observer, it would appear that such an endorsement must have been made (certain it’s not reading much into "I think that when the president wants to be helpful, I think that I should give him that opportunity.").

Unfortunately, now we find out that Dean’s oft printed remarks ("When the former president of the United States asks you to go to church with him on the Sunday before caucuses, I think you probably take that up,") weren’t actually quite that true once refuted by Carter himself ("I didn’t invite him, but I’m glad he came… He called me on the phone and said he’d like to come worship… He called me and asked me if it would be all right.") But, let’s not quibble over who called who, or the appearances of deception. We’ll just call it an accidental mis-impression.

No, more important than all this, I believe, was the Sunday School lesson that Carter taught. According to the AJC, it was "Integrity in Everyday Life" - based on Job. What a coincidence, since it was Dean who declared Job his favorite book of the Bible (OK, I know he thought it was in the New Testiment rather than the Old Testiment, but at least let’s give him credit for knowing there is a book of Job). So I hope that he listened even more closely to the lesson.

Integity: Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code. The state of being unimpaired; soundness. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness

Good definitions, but sometimes tough to wrap your head around in these days of moral relativity and situational-ethics. Usually we can recognize the trust that we have in someone that’s either in tact or broken more easily than we can define what it is to have ‘integrity’.

Pretty tough stuff for anyone. Especially a politician. Whenever someone rises to the point of national prominance, it’s easy to believe that they could already have long since had their character compromised in order to reach these levels of power. But I contend it’s never too late to start doing the right thing.

I’m no theologian, but here goes the story: Satan submits Job, a righteous man, to a trial, with God’s permission. The first trial is the loss of his goods, but Satan does not attain his purpose, to make Job curse God. Now Satan obtains permission to rob Job of his health, which, according to Satan’s calculations, Job will not tolerate. The teaching in the Scripture that sickness doesn’t come as a result of sin, contradicts the commonly held belief of that culture and time. Three of Job’s friends come and make the case that he has sinned, thereby causing the ‘punishments’ that have happened to him. In yesterday’s lesson, we hear Job maintaining his integrity by refusing to admit that he was guilty of any of the sins his friends accused him of. He refutes, point by point, all of the false accusations: Fraud and injustice, Adultery, Severity toward his servants, Unmercifulness to the poor, Confidence in his wealth, Idolatry, Revenge, Neglect of poor strangers, and Hypocrisy.

Through all of this, the suffering and the false accusations, Job remained steadfast in his belief in God. Encouraged even by his wife to curse God, he did not. And that’s true faith. More that perhaps any man could be expected to do. A heck of a lot more than dealing with criticisms from other candiates seeking the same political office.

A nice reflection on Job from Heartlight.org:

In this unjust world, a life of integrity depends on trusting God even when we don’t understand him. Fact is, we won’t make a single promise or hold a single conviction that won’t be tested; Satan sees to that. The question is, will our courage match our commitment? The secret of maintaining our integrity is to keep our eyes focused beyond our suffering, failures, and pain on the dazzling, glorious greatness of our God, who remains constant and trustworthy. When we can say with all our heart, "God, if I suffer or die, I will suffer or die giving glory to you. If I live, I will live giving glory to you. Either way I’m trusting you," then we are a tiny step closer to the Almighty.

As someone once said: "The one who is a Christian in small things is not a small Christian." How true. I don’t care who the candidate is… I hope that they keep their eye on the big picture. Not simply trying to impress with a few sound bites or pictures. Please don’t break that trust.

del.icio.us:Dean's Trip to Sunday School digg:Dean's Trip to Sunday School spurl:Dean's Trip to Sunday School wists:Dean's Trip to Sunday School simpy:Dean's Trip to Sunday School newsvine:Dean's Trip to Sunday School blinklist:Dean's Trip to Sunday School furl:Dean's Trip to Sunday School reddit:Dean's Trip to Sunday School fark:Dean's Trip to Sunday School blogmarks:Dean's Trip to Sunday School Y!:Dean's Trip to Sunday School smarking:Dean's Trip to Sunday School magnolia:Dean's Trip to Sunday School segnalo:Dean's Trip to Sunday School

Today we hear that a 19 year old German man, a passenger, is in custody and being questioned in connection with a bomb hoax aboard a Delta Airlines flight from Frankfort to Atlanta.

I’ve flown on that flight from Frankfort to Atlanta. I would not like to think that it, nor any other flight, would be blown up. I am encouraged by the quick reaction to the note found in the plane’s restroom, which still caused the flight to be diverted to Ireland. The plane had to be secured and searched. The passengers had to be questioned, fingerprinted, delayed for a day, and certainly likely scared out of their wits.

I don’t know why anyone would try to pull such a stunt. Publicity? Sickness? Something more? I don’t care the motive, really. That’s something for the psychiatrist. But I hope they throw the book at him.

In the back of my mind, I know that the punishment will probably not end up being much of anything. In 2001, when Micheal Lasseter ran the wrong way down an escalator to breach security and ended up closing down Atlanta International Airport (all because he was afraid of missing his flight to see a Georgia football game), he directly caused all flights to be delayed or cancelled. In the case of ‘Wrong Way’ Lasseter, his criminal punishment was reported as five weekends in jail, 500 hours of community service, two years’ probation, and a one-year ban on attending University of Georgia football games. Cute, but not exactly striking much in the way of a deterrent to others. His lawyer said that Lasseter performed his community service "by coaching children’s soccer and teaching a children’s class at his church&quot. Now I’ve both coached kids soccer and taught classes at my church. It is not wrong to say those actions serve the community. But these do not speak as loud as real jail time and a huge fine would.

I’m not sure what will happen to this German kid. If the criminal justice system is not up to the task, I think it would be fair to let the civil justice system help. In the case of Lasseter, AirTran Airways, just one of the air carriers struck by his trip down an up escalator, filed a lawsuit seeking to recover some $100,000 in losses it experienced due to his actions (with the actual cost to the airline possibility being more the $1 million). At that time, his lawyer ranted that the lawsuit was a "dastardly, exploitive, irresponsible and senseless action.". It was later dropped.

But the least that should happen would be for Delta Airlines, the airport, the security officials, and all passengers involved to be completely reimbursed for any losses caused by this German teen’s actions. Unlike the ignorance claimed in the Lasseter case (and he really could not have been as dumb as he claimed to be), writing a note claiming there is a bomb on board is akin to yelling ‘Fire’ in a crowded theatre. Time to take responsibility. Pay up.

del.icio.us:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre digg:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre spurl:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre wists:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre simpy:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre newsvine:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre blinklist:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre furl:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre reddit:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre fark:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre blogmarks:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre Y!:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre smarking:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre magnolia:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre segnalo:Yelling 'Fire' In a Crowded Theatre

Next Page »